Professional virtual currency information station welcome
We have been making efforts.

vc Page 2

Cryptocurrency is a non-legal monetary asset based on digital technology and blockchain, possessing the functions of a medium of exchange and a store of value. Cryptocurrency is a transaction medium that uses cryptographic principles to ensure transaction security and control the creation of transaction units. Cryptocurrency is a type of digital currency (or virtual currency). Bitcoin became the first decentralized cryptocurrency in 2009, after which the term “cryptocurrency” was more commonly used to refer to such designs. Since then, several similar cryptocurrencies have been created, and they are usually referred to as altcoins. Cryptocurrency is based on a decentralized consensus mechanism, in contrast to the banking financial system that relies on a centralized regulatory system.

Losing Money Buying Digital Collectible Blind Boxes? The Court Ordered The Platform To Pay 70% Of The Compensation

A technology company was sued in court for operating a digital collection trading platform that induced irrational transactions among users, resulting in the failure of 11 users to recover their investment funds. On May 15, the Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People's Court (hereinafter referred to as: Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People's Court) held a public hearing and pronounced a verdict. It determined that the platform failed to fulfill its risk warning and transaction restriction obligations and made major mistakes. The final judgment rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment. The platform assumed 70% liability for compensation.

The scene of the trial. Source: Beijing No. 3 Middle School

"Blind box" and "fragment synthesis" gimmicks divert traffic, and platform outage causes user losses

A technology company sells blind boxes containing digital collections to users through its APP applications, WeChat mini programs and other platforms, and provides display, browsing, settlement and other services for users to trade digital collections on the platform, and charges a certain percentage of handling fees.

From May to October 2022, Zheng and 11 other people purchased blind boxes containing digital collections multiple times through an APP and WeChat applet operated by a technology company, and participated in transactions such as "fragment synthesis". Later, the operating platform of a technology company ceased operations, and the digital collections held by users could not be traded and liquidated. Zheng and 11 other people sued for the return of investment funds and interest.

The court of first instance found that the platform engaged in behaviors such as inducing consumption and exaggerating earnings during transactions. Because the platform transactions have basically stagnated, the digital collections held by users cannot actually continue to be traded and the value of the digital collections cannot be realized. A certain technology company was obviously at fault and was ordered to bear 70% of the liability.

After the first-instance court's ruling, a technology company believed that it should not bear responsibility and appealed to the Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People's Court.

The platform has a higher duty of care, and 70% of the responsibility remains unchanged

The Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People's Court held after trial that a compound contractual relationship consisting of a sales contract and a network service contract was formed between a technology company and 11 people including Zheng. From the perspective of the digital collection transaction model involved in the case, a technology company’s ability to control transactions, profit model, and promotion of healthy industry development and risk prevention, compared with general commodity transactions, a technology company, as the issuer, seller, and transaction service platform provider of digital collections, should have a higher duty of care.

A technology company failed to provide evidence to prove the economic value of the digital collections it sold, failed to provide rational consumption risk warnings, failed to limit possible speculation and hype, and even clearly induced users to trade irrationally. A technology company had obvious faults and should be liable for compensation to 11 people including Zheng.

Accordingly, the Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People's Court made a final judgment, rejecting the appeal and upholding the original judgment. This judgment has taken effect.

The judge reminded that in recent years, with the upgrade of blockchain technology, my country's digital collection industry has continued to heat up, playing an important role in promoting traditional Chinese culture, enriching digital economic models, and promoting the development of cultural and creative industries. However, there are also risks and dangers such as speculation, money laundering, and illegal financial activities. Buyers should view digital collections rationally, establish correct consumption concepts, and avoid blind speculation. Digital collection trading platforms have a relatively higher duty of care than general commodity traders. They should consciously abide by national laws and regulations, put an end to false propaganda, speculation and other behaviors, resist and prevent the financialization of digital collections, and promote the healthy development of the industry.

Beijing News reporter Wu Mengzhen and editor Liu Qian proofread Zhang Yanjun

Beware Of Digital Collection Scams: 1.5% Daily Profit? Be Careful Not To Lose All Your Principal

"The daily income is as high as '1.5% ~ 2%'" "Deposit 100,000 yuan, and the interest will be 1,400 yuan a day" "(Invest) 500,000 yuan can earn more than 7,000 yuan a day"… Is this kind of yield a "pie" or a "trap"? Recently, Chao News reporters have received several complaints from readers, saying that they were suspected of being deceived by an investment platform called "Future Yunqi".

The complainant said that the platform uses virtual "digital collections" as investment targets, claiming that the collections have "appreciation potential" and the daily income is considerable. But in fact, these collections have no real value support and cannot be freely traded or freely withdrawn. The system backend can even force them to be removed from the shelves or "analyzed" into worthless "gold treasures" at any time, making all digital assets useless.

Reporters found that there are still many complaints against Future Yunqi on social platforms such as WeChat video accounts and Xiaohongshu.

What kind of platform is this? Are its operations in violation of regulations? What risks do investors face? The reporter conducted an in-depth investigation.

Post-00s guy takes out a loan to speculate on “digital collections”

More than 700,000 yuan was deposited into the platform and was wasted

Xiao Tang (pseudonym), a "post-00s generation" in Taizhou, Zhejiang, reported on Future Yunqi on social platforms, saying that the company was suspected of defrauding college students from tuition fees and inducing teenagers to take loans. He himself suffered a total loss of more than 700,000 yuan.

The reporter contacted Xiao Tang, who learned about the "Future Yunqi" APP in February 2025. "At the gym, a fitness instructor recommended it and said it could make money." Xiao Tang said that the instructor told him that Future Yunqi is China's leading "digital collection" service provider. You can get considerable profits by participating in the "picture grabbing" recharge activity on the Future Yunqi platform. Under the "slow growth" mode of the platform, it promises a daily increase of 1.5% to 2.0%, and both the recharge amount and the income can be freely withdrawn.

Such a generous reward made Xiao Tang excited. He immediately downloaded the APP and registered, chose to join one of the trading communities, and contacted the "team leader" of the community. Xiao Tang said that the community team leader is mainly responsible for attracting "subordinates" to the platform to "play". The collections of the "subordinates" will appreciate in value at a certain rate every day, and the team leader can get a "handling fee", which is a rebate.

As for the real name and identity of the team leader, Xiao Tang said he has never known it.

"Digital collection" without "sale key" Photo provided by interviewee

At the beginning, Xiao Tang invested several thousand yuan to try out his skills. He set his alarm clock at 3pm every day and snapped up "digital collections" on the APP (because the collections are all computer-generated pictures, users are accustomed to calling them "pictures"). "Pictures" that are usually released at 3 o'clock will be sold out in 2 minutes. After grabbing it, put the "picture" on the platform and "deposit" it, and the value will increase every day according to the increase. After the number of storage days is reached, you can make a profit by listing it on the platform and selling it.

"The short storage period is 5 days, and the long one is more than 20 days. You can see it every day, and the 'picture' will always 'appreciate'." Xiao Tang said that when he first started playing, the value did increase every day. After the storage period is reached, the system is unlocked and a "sell" button will be displayed. After appraising the value, you can sell it at any time, and you can freely withdraw cash after the fee is received.

As for who bought it, whether it was another real user, or whether it was recycled by the platform itself, Xiao Tang didn’t know. “I can only see the words sold.”

Driven by high returns and "team leader taking the lead", Xiao Tang invested a total of more than 700,000 yuan in multiple installments, of which 300,000 yuan was an online loan he borrowed.

"The team leader promised us to at least protect our capital. If we lose money, he will personally subsidize it. He also often posts rewards in the circle of friends of 'recharge 10,000 yuan and get a 100 yuan red envelope' to encourage us to increase our positions." Xiao Tang said.

Xiao Tang realized something was wrong when in July 2025, the collection worth 600,000 yuan held by Xiao Tang depreciated significantly and could not be sold. The platform explained that it was due to "hacker invasion." The team leader also told him that he needed to continue to invest additional funds to "unwind". Xiao Tang added funds again, but was trapped again.

“(Now) the collection cannot be sold or liquidated,” Xiao Tang said.

On social platforms, similar complainants also have many screenshots from Xiaohongshu

More than 300 people formed a group to defend their rights

“Platform management is chaotic and rules are formulated arbitrarily”

There are many people who have had the same experience as Xiao Tang, from all over the country.

The reporter joined two WeChat rights protection groups, with a total of more than 300 people in them. The amount invested by a single person ranged from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of yuan. Most of the group is born after 2000, some are still in college, and some of their funds come from tuition fees or online loans. Now, many people’s credit reports have collapsed and their lives are in trouble.

Xiao Yang, a post-2000 generation in Fujian, said that he and his relatives and friends had recharged a total of 580,000 yuan on the Future Yunqi platform. “All of my wealth was invested in the Future Yunqi platform to purchase digital collections, but the funds were withheld by the platform and have not been released so far.”

Mr. Luo from Ningbo said that in the future, Yunqi APP will recharge about 300,000 yuan, but the platform turned his assets into something called an "analysis card" on July 13, which has no value and cannot be liquidated. A Fujian user named Bibing (pseudonym) said that he lost 300,000 to 400,000 yuan on "Future Yunqi", and the balance was backdated into pictures, and his savings over the past few years were locked up.

Xiao Yang’s multiple applications for cash withdrawal were not approved by the respondent.

Xiao Yang said that the person in charge of Future Yunqi once responded, saying that the company is a digital collection company, and users on the platform are free to place orders and conduct voluntary transactions. The official does not promise profits, and the increase is not controlled by the platform. But in fact, Xiao Yang said, pending order trading is not that easy, and the rules are set by the platform and can be changed at will.

On December 22 and December 29, 2025, Future Yunqi issued two announcements to adjust the withdrawal rules. The first time required that the balance be multiplied by a coefficient of 1.6% for withdrawal. In other words, if the user has 10,000 yuan in his wallet, he can only withdraw 160 yuan. For the second time, the platform launched the "Future Wallet" function, with increasingly complex rules and strict withdrawal limits.

But the most fundamental problem is that users’ money is used to purchase pictures, but the pictures cannot be traded, realized, and withdrawn.

"Now I have all the pictures that cannot be sold. There is no 'sell' button anymore. The platform rules, picture values, and background data are all decided by the company." Xiao Yang said, "The interface of the platform has also completely changed."

The reporter logged into the Future Yunqi APP and found that the system was still in operation and there were still digital collections for sale on the homepage, but it showed that they were sold out. On social platforms, there are still many accounts "attracting new recruits" to Future Yunqi. One copy wrote: If you invest 10,000 yuan, you can receive a profit of 140 yuan a day, and you can earn more than 4,000 yuan a month. If you invest 100,000 yuan, you can make more than 7,000 yuan in just 5 days.

Such high returns are far beyond common sense.

The event flyer that Xiao Yang received before had words such as "compensation guaranteed" and "I will bear the risk" written on it. Provided by the interviewee

New Gameplay For Digital Collections: NFR Binds Physical Rights And Interests, Making Circulation More Reliable

The three words NFT make many people change their minds when they hear it.

The surge in 2021, the crash in 2022, and the large-scale flight in 2023 – that period of history will not be forgotten by those who have stepped on the pitfalls.

So why will the digital art assets track become hot again in 2026? Is this the second round of cutting leeks, or has there really been a qualitative change?

The answer is: It’s not the same thing.

NFT vs digital collection vs NFR, three concepts need to be distinguished

NFT (Non-Fungible Token): Built on public chains such as Ethereum, decentralized and circulated globally. It sounds beautiful, but the problem is: under China’s regulatory framework, public chain transactions involve cryptocurrencies, with ambiguous legal status and extremely high risks. Most NFT projects are not supported by physical assets, and their value depends purely on consensus. Once the consensus collapses, it will return to zero.

Digital collections (domestic compliance version): Runs on the consortium chain, is not linked to cryptocurrency, and is subject to regulatory constraints. It is stable, but the liquidity is poor. If you buy it, it is basically locked, making it difficult to trade again.

NFR (non-fungible equity certificate): This is the latest generation. The core difference is that it binds physical property rights and commercial rights.

Dimensions

Traditional digital collections

NFR equity certificate

Rights content

Digital Image Ownership

Binding physical property rights + commercial interests

Liquidity

restricted

Designed to be circulated

value support

digital image itself

Physical assets + IP equity

Rights confirmation method

On-chain storage

On-chain + legal double confirmation of rights

Compliance

generally

High (connected with Shenzhen Cultural Exchange)

The Hongyike project adopts the NFR system. Buy a "Painting Series" NFR, and what you actually own is:

The legal ownership certificate of the original work signed by Mo Xuanzi. Digital files stored in decentralized IPFS (never lost). Intelligent contract automatically executes rights and interests to guarantee the highest level of membership (priority for art exhibitions, autographs, and offline activities).

The four no principles delineate the boundaries: no financialization, no securitization, no acceptance of speculation, and no promise of returns. These four items have blocked the biggest risk points in advance.

In the digital collection 2.0 era, the rules have changed.

Question interaction: Have you ever been fooled by NFT? If it were a compliant NFR, would you still consider it? Chat in the comment area

Who Is Musk? Understand His Achievements And Experiences In One Article

Profile

埃隆·马斯克 投资创业_埃隆·马斯克 早年经历_马斯克

Elon Musk

Elon Musk was born on June 28, 1971 in Pretoria, the administrative capital of South Africa (now known as Tshwane). He holds dual nationality of Canada and the United States, and is an entrepreneur, engineer, and philanthropist. He is currently CEO and CTO of SpaceX, CEO of Tesla, and Chairman of the Board of Directors of SolarCity. Elon Musk graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a double major in economics and physics.

On May 31, 2012, the "Dragon" capsule of Musk's company SpaceX successfully docked with the International Space Station and returned to Earth, ushering in the era of private operation of space transportation. On November 21, 2013, the famous American financial magazine "Fortune" announced the "Business Person of the Year 2013", and Tesla Motors CEO Musk topped the list. On September 22, 2016, Elon Musk ranked 11th on Bloomberg's list of the world's 50 most influential people. On December 14, 2016, he won the honor of "The Most Influential CEO in 2016". On December 4, 2017, he ranked 43rd on Bloomberg Businessweek's 2017 list of the world's 50 most influential people.

At 4:45 on February 7, 2018, SpaceX's "Falcon Heavy" launch vehicle successfully launched for the first time from the Kennedy Space Center in the United States and successfully completed the complete recovery of two first-stage booster rockets.

Early life

埃隆·马斯克 投资创业_马斯克_埃隆·马斯克 早年经历

Elon Musk

Elon Musk was born in Pretoria, South Africa on June 28, 1971. His father is an Anglo-Dutch mixed-race man who works as an electrical and mechanical engineer in South Africa. His mother was born in Canada and is a model who also works as a writer and nutritionist. In 1980, Elon Musk lived with his father after his parents divorced. Inspired by his father, Elon Musk was obsessed with science and technology when he was a child.

In 1981, 10-year-old Elon Musk used his pocket money and part of the funds sponsored by his father to buy his first computer. Later, he bought a programming textbook and learned how to program.

In 1983, 12-year-old Elon Musk successfully designed a space game software called "Blastar" and later sold it to "PC and Office Technology" magazine for $500, making his first pot of gold in his life.

In 1988, 17-year-old Elon Musk left his family after graduating from Pretoria Boys' High School and went to Canada alone to live with his mother's relatives.

In 1989, Elon Musk obtained Canadian citizenship and applied to attend Queen's University in Ontario the following year.

In 1992, Elon Musk transferred to the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania on a scholarship to study economics. During his college years, Elon Musk began to pay in-depth attention to the Internet, clean energy, and space, three areas that will affect the future development of mankind. After Elon Musk received a bachelor's degree in economics, he stayed in school for another year and received a bachelor's degree in physics.

Investment and entrepreneurship

In 1995, after dropping out of school, Elon Musk and his brother Kimbal Musk founded Zip2, a company that developed online content publishing software for news organizations, with random angel investment from a small group in Silicon Valley. At that time, both the New York Times and the Chicago Post became customers of the Musk brothers.

Main achievements

Elon Musk has a close relationship with Hollywood. Movie star George Clooney and director Cameron are all his guests. Searching for his name in the Internet Movie Database yields a long list of results. Musk has served as a producer on three films.

In 2000, Elon Musk's sister Tosca Musk established the independent film production company "Musk Entertainment". Elon Musk served as the producer of the first movie "Quiz", and other famous ones such as "Thank you for smoking" in 2005. The 1994 Dassault Falcon 900 aircraft that appeared in this movie was registered in his name. In addition, he has guest-starred as himself in 7 movies and TV series.

When the director of Iron Man approached Elon Musk in order to enrich the role, he expressed strong interest in being a producer. Part of the film was shot in the empty factory area of ​​SpaceX headquarters. In the final credits, Elon Musk's name was listed in the "Special Thanks" column.

Elon Musk has recently told everyone he meets that he wants to retire on Mars. SpaceX’s factory in Hawthorne, California, has 1,500 engineers working hard on this goal. Hanging next to the door is a huge picture of Mars. The huge former Boeing 777 manufacturing plant houses the Falcon 9 rocket and the capsule-shaped spacecraft called the Dragon spacecraft.

personal life

On January 18, 2012, Elon Musk announced on Twitter that he had broken up with British actress Talulah Riley. His last wife was a science fiction writer. Because he kept exposing the details of the divorce on his blog, especially the property disputes, it once caused a media storm and finally broke up.

Elon Musk's name often appears in entertainment reports. In the public eye, Musk often appears as a playboy. For example, he once bought a McLaren F1 sports car for US$1 million, flies on private jets, and cannot stay with a woman for a long time. Both of his marriages ended in breakup, with the second ending not long ago.

Elon Musk is nowhere near as cool as Iron Man. Musk is not only a technology freak, but also a workaholic. He works more than 100 hours a week. He is extremely busy and often lies down at 3 o'clock at night. He has to rush to a meeting early the next morning and fly to another city to participate in an event in the evening. He also has to find time to play with his five sons. In an interview, he specifically clarified that his original intention of starting SpaceX was not the childhood complex that some people take for granted, nor was it because of its high return on investment, but because it would be deeply beneficial to the future of mankind.

Sometimes, his personality can get him into trouble. He was sued for defamation by Tesla co-founder Martin Eberhard, and eventually settled out of court.

social evaluation

Elon Musk’s friends describe him as a person with extremely clear goals and a habit of seeing the world from an engineer’s perspective. Adeo Ressi, his roommate at the University of Pennsylvania, said that he is also a crazy entrepreneur. When they were in college, the two of them opened a nightclub. Every time the police called, Musk always responded calmly.

When he was in college, he often thought about what are the real problems facing the world and which ones will affect the future of mankind. He is bullish on the internet, sustainable energy and space exploration. Later, he entered these three fields as promised and dropped three blockbusters in succession: PayPal, Tesla Motors and SpaceX.

"As long as he sees something good, he will keep working hard until he reaches his goal," Ressi said.

He will fight back relentlessly against those who oppose him, making no secret of his true thoughts.

What Is STO? To Put It Simply, It Is Compliant Currency Issuance And Financing.

Regarding the process of applying blockchain technology, if there is nothing more attractive than the ICO currency issuance. The STO method can satisfy both supervision and currency issuance, which is an improvement for ICO. The STO (Security Token Offering) model seems mysterious to say, but in fact the reason is very simple, so STO is a model worth looking at.

1. Security tokens are not cryptocurrencies, nor are they unregulated ICOs

Security tokens are essentially digital traditional securities. If you have invested in securities in any form (stocks, bonds, real estate, CDs, etc.), then you must understand what it means to hold securities. For example, a security token simply replaces your paper stock certificate with a digital version.

When you invest in a security token, you are actually investing in the underlying asset. The existence of a security token doesn’t seem to matter – it’s simply a digital proof of your ownership of a security. Because security tokens are digital, they are more efficient than traditional methods. They can also be traded on global markets, giving the securities a level of liquidity that traditional securities cannot achieve.

In the United States, most security tokens are issued under an exemption from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission—usually Reg. D+Reg.S.

At present, 39 companies have successfully applied for the issuance of Sto tokens. What kind of companies are suitable for issuing Sto security tokens? The promise of global liquidity may be a valuable feature of security tokens. Security tokens are able to represent fractional ownership of an asset and be traded on global security token markets and exchanges—two things that are nearly impossible to achieve with traditional securities.

We will have a professional team to create a distribution plan that is suitable for you based on your company's situation.

Let me explain to you the sto issuance process.

1. The team consults and evaluates the project company.

2. Research the entire project issuance plan, including white paper modification, project sorting, and plan design

3. Establish a VIE structure, register a Cayman or U.S. main company, and achieve control through an agreement

4. Issue corresponding legal compliance documents according to the country where the main company is located

5. According to different platform rules, platforms suitable for issuing Tokens can connect to exchange services.

It is expected that relevant regulations in the future will focus on corresponding models such as STO. In short, the government will gradually penetrate into the links that can supervise the issuance of digital currencies. Regardless of the regulatory method, of course, ICO will definitely still exist.

STO Is Not The Savior Of The Blockchain, Don’t Be Fooled

The cryptocurrency market, long plagued by controversy, has been plunging for a year. LongHash analysis found that 30 of the top 50 cryptocurrencies fell by more than 90% in 2018. Currently, the market is still generally bearish. As the ICO craze cools down and ETH prices plummet, some are beginning to worry that the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry may be dying.

Given this environment, it's easy to see why people are scrambling to find possible breakthroughs. This also explains why many people are excited about security token offerings, or STOs. Security tokens are cryptocurrencies that are pegged to real-world securities (such as equity) and are therefore more stringent than most ICO tokens. Security tokens have become so hot that some investors are calling them the next crypto bubble.

Many people believe that STO will save the blockchain industry. They won't. STO is actually like using the Internet to send faxes, neither fish nor fowl.

To be more precise, STO is just another WinFax. In the early days of the development of the Internet, there was a software called WinFax that could simulate faxing on Windows systems through software. At the time, computers were connected to the Internet via modems, and many traditional office workers had not yet understood what the Internet was or how to use email. They are most familiar with fax machines, so they are more comfortable using fax than email. For this reason, WinFax emerged. This may sound ridiculous, but some people at the time actually viewed the Internet as just another fax system. In 1998, Paul Krugman, who later won the Nobel Prize in Economics, said: "By around 2005, the Internet will have no more impact on the economy than the fax machine."

Similarly, on the surface, STOs appear to be just another way to issue tokens. However, STO is very different from ICO. The most significant feature of STO is that the tokens issued have security properties and are regulated by securities agencies (such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission), so they must comply with relevant securities laws and regulations.

While security tokens are distributed on a blockchain, which is supposed to be a fully decentralized platform, they still must meet know-your-customer (KYC) requirements and regulations must be adhered to when trading.

STO may look good. For blockchain projects and investors, the threshold is much lower than an IPO, but much higher than an ICO, since almost anyone can create ICO tokens and sell them to the public. STO sounds good, right?

Not exactly. STO destroys the essence of blockchain technology – decentralization. From token issuance to regulation, every step of the STO process must be completed in a centralized manner.

When a decentralized system has an influential central node, STO is just talk. It is also difficult to understand why we would want to use a blockchain platform to simulate existing securities issuance platforms. After all, we already have a well-proven functional securities platform like Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange. Why do we need a less efficient imitation?

To some extent, we can think of STOs as a large-scale recruitment campaign for compliant blockchain projects, but in the end, this campaign may still end in failure. After all, a fax is not an email, and assets on the blockchain are not securities. Any decentralized system that attempts to centralize governance and operations will find itself with inconsistencies. The decentralized nature of blockchain makes it a unique and powerful technology. Without that functionality, a blockchain is nothing more than an inefficient database.

Today, many young people do not know what a fax is, and they have never seen a fax machine. It is now clear to everyone that the Internet is not a simple extension of fax technology, and email is not the same as fax. In terms of efficiency and functionality, the Internet has gone far beyond the concept of fax.

However, we have to admit that at that time, WinFax did meet the needs of many people. By helping people use the Internet in a way that made them comfortable, WinFax may have prompted more companies to buy computers and try using the Internet. We might even say this propelled the internet towards mainstream usage.

Likewise, we need regulation for wider crypto adoption, but STOs are not the answer. Blockchain technology is new and has its own unique characteristics and development path, and should therefore be regulated in an innovative manner accordingly.

Just as we wouldn’t transplant the regulations we use to regulate newspapers or magazines to regulate the Internet, we shouldn’t force blockchain assets to comply with securities laws. We cannot regulate new technologies by forcing them to conform to old regulatory frameworks. Suppressing the decentralization of blockchain will only be counterproductive.

WEB3's Overseas Expansion Has Become A New Trend. Is It Hype Or The Future?

Compared with the market's certainty of new consumption in the past two years, almost no one has mentioned the word 2022.

In the past few months, when brand managers and many entrepreneurs and observers discussed the future development of the industry, going overseas and Web3 were almost the two most mentioned keywords. The former is not a new topic, but due to the superposition of multiple factors such as the policy and economic external environment, 2021 is more considered to be an inflection point for Chinese companies to go overseas, and it will further accelerate in 2022.

But Web3 is still a new term for most people, and it is even a concept with more hype than practical application prospects. Although in the past six months, a large number of institutions and entrepreneurs have entered the new track, there are also opponents who believe that this is just another money-making game.

Objectively speaking, the ideal world advocated by Web3 is indeed still in the conceptual stage, and it is difficult to describe clearly whether it is the underlying consensus, infrastructure or application ecology.

The separation of viewpoints creates more room for discussion. We believe that no one will not pay attention to the future shape of economic and technological social development, and every exploration in the business field will have a real impact on practitioners.

We welcome more Web3 practitioners, investors, and even opponents to share your understanding and opinions with us.

This is the first article in our series of focusing on new trends and discussing Web3. It is shared by a former media person and current overseas investment researcher from an institution.

In the context of frequent news of layoffs from traditional Internet giants, investment institutions reducing investment scale and changing investment trends, Web3 seems to be an alternative.

First, there were reports that the post-2000 generation was crazy about Web3 and regarded Web3 as a career choice; then venture capital institutions were betting heavily on Web3. Both traditional VC institutions and relatively young cryptocurrency investment institutions began to set their sights on the Web3 track.

Where does the Web3 investment trend come from? What exactly does Web3, which is being discussed in the Internet venture capital circle today, mean? What is the relationship between Web3 and blockchain?

01. The investment scale during the year exceeded US$17 billion, and leading Internet VCs turned to Web3

Just at the beginning of the third quarter of 2022, more than 30 investment institutions have announced the establishment of Web3 investment funds, with a total investment scale of more than US$17 billion, including well-known institutions such as Sequoia Capital, Qualcomm, and Ark Ventures.

In terms of the investment scale of a single fund, Sequoia Capital’s investment fund is close to US$3 billion, making it the second largest company currently investing in Web3. The investment fund that has bet the most on Web3 is a16z, with an investment scale of nearly US$8 billion.

a16z is a Silicon Valley venture capital firm founded in 2009 and has invested in a series of technology giants such as Facebook and Twitter. In less than 10 years, a16z quickly surpassed a series of established investment companies and became the third largest Internet investment institution in the United States. To a certain extent, we can say that a16z plays an indispensable role in the development of mobile Internet.

But in the tenth year since its establishment, a16z suddenly realized that the golden age of mobile Internet had passed, at least for investors, as the stock prices of the core targets in its investment portfolio plummeted.

a16z had to start looking for a new track. Not only to discover new trends and gain wealth, but also to continue the glory of the past.

This time a16z put its chips on the blockchain. In June 2018, a16z established the a16z crypto fund, a crypto fund worth US$300 million, and has successively invested in star projects in the blockchain field such as CoinBase, Uniswap, Solana, and maker Dao. Up to now, A16z has invested in more than a hundred blockchain projects, and has gained a lot from it. It is called the "vane of investment in the currency circle".

In 2021, a16z publicly sounded the clarion call to march towards web3, and the high returns it achieved also set off an investment and entrepreneurship boom in this field.

Different from the strictness in the past, a16z seems a bit "urgent" when betting on Web3. According to the "Yuanverse Investment and Financing White Paper for the First Quarter of 2022" released by Sina, in the first quarter of 2022, a16z's total investment in the Yuanverse field reached US$592 million, accounting for 18% of the total investment in the first quarter.

The madness of a16z has become a microcosm of the Web3 craze. According to statistics, almost 95% of the Web3 investment funds currently on the market have been established for less than one year. In addition, more and more major Internet companies at home and abroad are also accelerating their deployment in the Web3 field, such as Meta, Google, Alibaba or Tencent.

But the paradox is that, on the one hand, there is a crazy influx of capital, on the other hand, investors are ambiguous about web3, coupled with intensive media reports, everyone is talking about Web3, but no one can tell what exactly Web3 is.

02. The conceptual boundaries are blurred, and the core of Web3 is freedom.

Tracing the history of Web3, we can see that Gavin Wood, the co-founder of the leading cryptocurrency Ethereum, was inspired by the "Prism Gate" and proposed the concept of Web3 in 2014, hoping that a new generation of Internet residents could independently control their own digital assets and digital information.

However, for a long time after the concept was proposed, neither investors nor speculators hyping the concept paid much attention to Web3, let alone believed that Web3 would become the next trend.

At that time, people were in the period of rapid development of the Internet, and the Internet had already provided unlimited imagination to the capital market. Capital was enthusiastic about the Internet, not Web3, which had no clear concept, development direction, and business model. Even Gavin Wood himself has not defined the concept of Web3 very clearly, and only put forward a core idea of ​​"allowing users to have ownership of their own digital assets."

This directly leads to the formation of an atmosphere of "Web3 must be spoken" at the beginning of 2022, but no one can say with certainty what Web3 is and gain unanimous approval from everyone.

The most recognized definition in the market currently is: "In the Web1 era it was 'readable', in Web2 it was 'readable + writable', and in the Web3 era it was not only 'readable + writable', but also added the new feature of 'owning'."

In other words, in the Web1 era, the producers of the Internet were centralized organizations or companies, and users could only participate in the construction of Web1 as a recipient. However, in the Web2 era, based on the increase in mobile Internet bandwidth and the enhancement of algorithm technology, users can participate in ecological construction. The most obvious examples are Weibo and WeChat public accounts.

In the Web2 era, although users have certain production rights, they do not fully own the ownership of the content produced. For example, for some reason, the platform server where you publish content is attacked or goes bankrupt and shuts down, then the content will disappear out of your control.

In the Web3 era, this series of problems will be solved. The core concept of Web3 is based on a certain infrastructure. This infrastructure can be a public chain, a content distribution platform, or any functional virtual place you can imagine. Users can produce their own content and fully own the ownership of their content. They can decide whether to share it and who to share it with. In other words, the platform no longer has the right to control or delete your content.

Or we can use a more vivid metaphor to help understand this difference (just a superficial analogy).

For example, Web1 is a historical drama, so the direction of its characters and plots are established facts that the audience can only watch and cannot change. Web2 is an adapted drama or interactive drama. The audience can participate and even decide the direction and ending of the plot. However, the content still belongs to the publisher and film and television company. In essence, it only improves the audience's sense of in-depth participation. Web3 is based on an infrastructure where everyone can create characters and dramas, fully own and control the content, and decide whether to share it and who to share it with.

The above content reflects the public's emphasis on data privacy, but it cannot fully cover the current development direction and content in the Web3 field.

Like the concept of Web3, the current specific layered architecture of Web3 is still immature and fragmented, and there is no unified consensus, so there are many debates about this part.

I think the products that C-end users can see now, such as decentralized exchanges, NFTs (non-fungible tokens) represented by digital collections, and decentralized lending protocols, are all front-end products of Web3. The main purpose of these front-end products is to interact with C-end users. Their target customer group is the broadest general public, and they profit and realize through certain business models. The most intuitive manifestations of these products in the web2 era are various websites and apps.

Corresponding to the front-end is the back-end of Web3. The back-end is mainly the underlying facilities. This part includes smart contracts, public chains and other products. The target customer group of these products is the above-mentioned front-end products. For C-end users, there are few opportunities to come into contact with the back-end products of Web3, and they also have higher requirements for technical capabilities. In the web2 era, this part represents the underlying technology of the Internet, such as the TCP protocol.

But what can be confirmed is that in the eyes of all Web3 believers, the core of Web3 is "freedom", whether it is the freedom to manage one's own digital assets, or the freedom of senses or boundaries gained through new technological changes.

03. Web3’s blockchain background and new applications of decentralized technology

Although the scope of Web3 goes far beyond the direction covered by the current blockchain, an analysis of the current investment direction of Web3 investment funds shows that most startups in the Web3 field are related to blockchain tracks such as NFT (non-fungible tokens) and DeFi (decentralized finance). Combined with the background of the Web3 concept, most people regard Web3 as a native concept in the blockchain field.

At the underlying technology level, the current mainstream view is that the technical architecture of Web3 can be divided into basic layer technology, platform layer technology, and application layer technology. The basic layer technology is composed of blockchain technology. In addition, most of the current products in the Web3 field are concentrated in the blockchain field. Indeed, the current Web3 has a strong decentralization and blockchain flavor.

Existing network protocols divide massive data on the Internet and then store it on different servers. Once part of the data is lost, the data will become incomplete and tampered with relatively easily. All information in the blockchain system will be fully recorded on each server. Even if the data on a certain server is lost or damaged, the data on other servers can still remain intact. In such a multi-point distributed storage method, the data can be kept intact to the maximum extent and prevented from being tampered with by others.

The distributed and decentralized nature of the blockchain naturally fits the core requirements of Web3 believers for freedom and data ownership.

Therefore, to a certain extent, the development of Web3 is destined to not be separated from the blockchain.

Thanks to the blessing of blockchain technology, in the Web3 generation, it is possible for everyone to have their own platform, and developers can customize infrastructure for enterprises and individuals. These applications can be used for digital identity recognition and protection, as well as data protection and digital asset storage.

In addition, in the ecological construction of Web3, we also have to consider the incentive issue, that is, how to motivate users to participate in the ecological construction.

At present, in response to this problem, the industry generally agrees on the launch of a certain token with an incentive effect (token is mostly understood as a "token", but Q coins and points are also considered a kind of token), and the concept of token incentives was originally born out of the blockchain industry.

Perhaps in the future, more suitable technologies may emerge to help Web3 realize its vision, but currently, among all the relatively mature technologies on the market, only blockchain technology is the most suitable and close.

Conclusion:

In summary, in the current Web3 industry, there has not yet been any concept definition that can achieve the broadest consensus, but everyone unanimously recognizes the core concept of "freedom". At a technical level, Web3 does not yet have a fixed technical route, but the current blockchain technology is the closest and most appropriate technology.

The above is my basic understanding of Web3. Next, I hope to conduct continuous research and content discussion on the development status of web3, the opportunities and challenges of web3, etc.

[This article is authorized to be published by 36Kr, a partner in the investment community. This platform only provides information storage services. 】If you have any questions, please contact the investment community at (editor@zero2ipo.com.cn).

BNB Breaks Through $1,000! BNB Chain Official Website And Holding Value Analysis

BNB broke through the important psychological level of $1,000, and BNB Chain also ushered in another surge in on-chain activity. On September 21, its daily trading volume hit a new high in nearly 30 days, exceeding 16.5 million transactions in a single day. At the same time, BNB Chain and opBNB have also become the public chains with the highest number of daily active users.

BNB Chain is gradually becoming an amplifier of market sentiment, from Jobless, Aster to Giggle and Sign. With the support of CZ, it has advanced from a "wealth password" to a "wealth password" manufacturing machine.

In addition, BNB Chain is also striking while the iron is hot to strengthen its fundamentals and plans to reduce the cost of a single transaction to approximately US$0.005 through network upgrades. Wall Street asset management giant Franklin also officially announced the expansion of its self-developed tokenization platform Benji to BNB Chain.

However, in the high price and lively atmosphere, some long-term BNB holders did not choose to sell sharply and leave the market in time.

not much choice

After BNB broke through a new high of $1,000 recently, Kun, a market maker for the Binance Alpha project, did not sell. He has been holding BNB since 2021, and 90% of his positions are BNB.

Kun basically does not participate in other non-mainstream altcoins. "When I exit and I don't know where to go for the time being, I will first hold BNB to absorb the benefits of interest rate cuts."

However, as the staking lock-up period is lifted, Kun may consider withdrawing part of it. This is because after the launch of Binance Alpha, Launchpool’s income has decreased, and Kun’s passive income has also shrunk.

Another major BNB investor, Chen, has sold 20% and invested part of the funds in other platform coins, while a small amount of funds are betting on new hot memes on BNB Chain.

Starting from the beginning of 2024, he gradually invested 50% of his position in BNB when the BNB price was in the range of 300-500 US dollars. After CZ was released from prison, Chen continued to add positions. After recently selling 20% ​​of BNB, BNB now accounts for 30% of his entire position.

From May this year to now, BNB has risen from around $500 for almost five months. For Chen, taking profits at high points is a routine operation. The reason why there is no sharp sell-off is that firstly, he believes that BNB Chain is still on the trend, and secondly, there is no better place to go. "Bitcoin and Ethereum are growing too slowly, and other altcoins and Dogecoins only dare to test the water with small positions."

Crypto KOL BigFang shared on Youtube that $1,000 is an important psychological threshold. After the breakthrough, traditional OTC funds will enter the market.

In early September, Hong Kong's compliance exchange OSL opened BNB trading services to professional investors. BNB is also the sixth currency to be listed on the exchange. In addition, a number of listed companies have formed BNB strategic reserves, and VanEck and REX Shares & Osprey Funds have submitted applications for BNB ETFs to the US SEC.

The crypto KOL Big Big Orange revealed on Twitter that he has been holding BNB since the BNB ICO and has continued to increase his position by 1,000 BNB when it hit a new high of $990. After BNB’s new high, BNB remains its third largest position, behind Ethereum and Bitcoin.

In addition to continuing to hold BNB, he has also invested in the BNB Chain ecosystem and has purchased 1.4 million Aster, saying, "I want to hold Aster just like I held BNB 8 years ago."

Why can you hold a position for so long?

Compared with market sentiment such as CZ's possible return to Binance leadership, the long-term BNB holders interviewed this time may be more concerned about BNB's token economic model, team leadership and other fundamentals, as well as future incremental space.

1. BNB captures the real income of the BNB system

"From the perspective of the token economic model, BNB captures the real income of BNB." This is the most critical reason for Kun's position.

In Kun's view, on the one hand, BNB is repurchased and destroyed every quarter. This deflation mechanism directly feeds the exchange's profits back to the token value. Through continued token burning, the initial supply of BNB is reduced from 200 million to around 100 million, enhancing scarcity and value.

Kun mentioned that CZ and his team hold part of BNB, and these tokens will not flow to the market, which means that the circulating market value of BNB is lower than the data seen on the surface.

On the other hand, BNB uses Binance Alpha to allow project parties to form a fund pool on the BNB Chain. These capital pools will be established using BNB, resulting in a large amount of BNB being locked in the capital pool. This mechanism is similar to Solana's splitting principle, which reduces the circulation by locking tokens, thereby increasing the value of the tokens.

Holding BNB can enjoy additional benefits from Launchpool, HODLer airdrops, MegaDrop, etc., which is quite attractive. This is also a key reason for Chen, a major BNB investor, to hold it for a long time. Chen also mentioned that BNB, as the core asset of the Binance ecosystem, can be used in new activities such as transaction fees, staking and airdrops, as well as BNB Chain ecological applications, giving it strong value capture capabilities.

2. “Bull” CZ

The strategic and execution capabilities of CZ and BNB are also an important reason why everyone is generally willing to hold them for a long time.

Chen believes that Ethereum is more like a large company that is slow-paced and relies on external capital, while BNB Chain is like a proactive startup. Especially after CZ's return, the team continues to launch new projects and new gameplay, and there is always a way to shift market attention and funds to the BNB ecosystem.

Starting from CZ calling "test coin" TST in February, and then from CZ's dog, Mubarak, a CZ who originally said he didn't like memes, successfully transferred the community's enthusiasm for trading memecoin from Solana to BNB Chain.

After the meme craze temporarily subsided, Binance Alpha led the community to trade new Binance projects; since then, there have been narratives about Four.meme's platform currency and BNB's reserve strategy. Last week, after CZ changed the X account profile from "ex-@binance" back to "@binance", it then moved to Perp DEX, and then Aster increased dozens of times. The CZ effect has also begun to sweep through the community. CZ interactive projects include projects invested by YZi Labs, which have become the new password of the community.

Crypto KOL @yuyue_chris Yuyue also posted on the X platform that after CZ’s official “return”, people really feel like they can make money with him. “Binance has really understood the nature of assets this time.”

For Kun, who has a technical background, after seeing too many "Ponzi schemes" in the currency circle that deceive people from various angles such as technological innovation, CZ is one of the few who makes him feel that his intentions are good. "CZ has long been financially free. It is definitely not for money. As a man of science and engineering, he is active on the front line and pays attention to interesting content. It feels like it is more to consolidate the status of Binance as a whole."

3. Incremental space brought by traditional fields

The confidence in holding BNB not only comes from the vitality within the community, but also from the gradual recognition and adoption in traditional fields. This "external verification" brings BNB larger application scenarios and huge new funds.

In terms of application scenarios, on the one hand, Wall Street financial giants have successively expanded their RWA business to BNB Chain. Recently, asset management giant Franklin Templeton, which manages US$1.6 trillion, has expanded its tokenized products to BNB Chain. Another asset management giant, VanEck, also launched the tokenized treasury bond fund VBILL on the BNB Chain through cooperation with Securitize. Ondo Finance and xStock have also announced that they will introduce tokenized treasury bonds and structured products to the BNB Chain.

On the other hand, Binance Pay is also actively promoting its adoption in traditional commerce. Recently, it has been launched at 30,000 merchants in South Africa through cooperation with Zapper.

In terms of new funds, the BNB strategic treasury of traditional listed companies also brings structural buying.

In addition, the Greb Mindfulness City (GMC) Special Economic Zone in the Kingdom of Bhutan has included BNB in ​​its official strategic reserve asset list, which means that the value and security of BNB have received attention and recognition at the sovereign level.

4. The policy risks faced by Binance are reduced

In March this year, Binance announced that it had received a US$2 billion investment from Abu Dhabi’s state-owned capital MGX, which was a very positive signal for Kun. This means that Binance has found a strong "protective umbrella".

This year, as the U.S. encryption environment becomes increasingly friendly, the policy risks faced by Binance are gradually being lifted.

In May, the SEC applied to drop the lawsuit against Binance, Binance US and CZ. On September 16, Bloomberg reported that Binance was negotiating with the U.S. Department of Justice to potentially end the compliance monitoring period starting in 2023 early. This development has dispelled the market's biggest long-term doubts to a certain extent.

Under the global compliance trend, Binance has obtained regulatory licenses from about 21 countries or regions, including Dubai, Japan, the European Union and Southeast Asia, putting its business on a more compliant basis.

Conclusion

In the current market environment full of uncertainty, long-term holding of BNB not only reflects investors' pragmatic tendencies among limited choices, but also represents a vote of confidence in a continuously evolving ecosystem.

Binance Coin Official Website: Looking At The Safe Entrance Of BNB From The Anxiety Of The Currency Circle

I originally planned to do a review of recent transactions, but when I was just browsing the information, I saw a message saying that the largest short order holder in Hyperliquid Bitcoin had taken a loss of US$2.345 million and cleared its position. How can I put it, this news makes me more anxious about the industry.

This is not to say that there is anxiety about the market, but that people who have made money in the past are forced to enter the gaming market – and once they enter this state, it means that this market is no longer an investment market, but a high-frequency liquidation engine.

I have said many times publicly or internally that I only do two things this season, one is to hoard Bitcoin, and the other is to trade. Some people always ask why I don't pay attention to new tracks —– but this decision is exactly the decision I made after in-depth research on all new tracks, and it is also a decision to protect myself.

From 2017 to now, the currency circle has experienced various ups and downs. For example, the Mentougou incident, the 94 incident, the FTX thunderstorm, the 3AC thunderstorm, etc. Although these have had a severe impact on currency prices, they are just "children's fights" in the circle.

The disruption of DeFi, NFT, and the Metaverse in 2022 is both a good thing and a bad thing for the industry. The good thing is that the currency circle has finally entered the vision of the global capital market; the bad thing is that without a stable decentralized order, it has faced a heavier test in advance. Now it seems that the results are obviously unsatisfactory.

I have repeatedly said that the first value of the currency circle is called "decentralization", which is to establish an "economic system without centralized definitions and modified rules, and everyone competes fairly under the rules." This is the greatest value of the currency circle. Otherwise, there is no way to beat the traditional financial system at any level of efficiency. If it cannot be beaten, it will not be subverted. Without subversion, there will be no new wealth distribution. It will only be co-opted, tamed, and disappear.

But now, apart from Bitcoin, I can only say that "decentralization" has made no achievements. Not only has it made no achievements, it is also being attacked from both sides.

Externally, Wall Street is dissolving the fundamental tenets of "decentralization" through ETFs, RWAs, stablecoins, regulations and policies, and is trying to turn the decentralized financial system on the chain into the dollar hegemony on the centralized chain, and the results are not bad – to this day, everyone is talking about compliance, the expansion of institutional risk exposure, the currency circle has joined the mainstream world, and all the gains and losses no longer come from the value discovery of "decentralization".

Internally, when there is no breakthrough in the application, PERP and the prediction market become the last nuggets. In particular, the rise of Hyperliquid has made leveraged trading lower, the matching efficiency is faster, assets wear out faster, funds are redistributed, and the money goes into the pockets of casino owners—–Have you ever seen any casino owner who creates value for the industry, like Musk?

The reason why it is attacked from both sides is that, except for Bitcoin, the industry has no real censorship-resistant advantages, no institutional advantages that cannot be tampered with, and no institutional dividends. Most of the so-called decentralized applications are essentially "centralized products on the chain."

In the past, my assets were often divided into three layers for betting. The first layer was cross-cycle betting, buying Bitcoin; the second layer was to take advantage of fluctuations, that is, trading; and the last layer was the application layer where the betting narrative had not yet been formed. Now the last layer has been cut off directly, which is very sad because I confirm that there is no new value in the industry and I can only choose to live.

Note that I choose to live, not leave. It’s not that this industry doesn’t have commercial products, it also has Bitcoin. The current currency circle is no longer a stranger, but is truly facing the mainstream world and the impact of centralization.

What cannot be defeated will make it stronger. Although I am anxious, I am still determined. I still think that the currency circle is a place where new worlds are created, even if it now behaves like an efficient harvesting machine.

But throughout the ages, all emerging assets in history have experienced it, and 90% of the time they are in the stage of excessive financialization, and the remaining 10% of the time is changing the world.

The currency circle has reached its most critical moment, which is also the moment of nirvana and rebirth. "Moment" is a time process. It will not get better in the short term, but it will become more real. In the long term, all real things will become more expensive.

But what really determines your destiny. It’s not about whether the industry has ideals but:

Did we survive at the wrong stage?

——

Believe in the power of belief, we have never been disappointed here.

Risk warning: Digital assets are a high-risk investment target. The general public is requested to view the blockchain rationally, increase risk awareness, and establish correct currency concepts and investment concepts.

Binance Coin Official Website Entrance | BNB Official Platform Guide

代币化存款_Binance Coin Official Website_存款代币

Reference News Network reported on May 16 that the Bloomberg News website recently published an article entitled "Stablecoins go away, a new token is coming". The author is Andy Mukherjee. The article is compiled as follows

People in the digital currency community are now divided into two camps. Traditional thinkers want public institutions to remain responsible for providing a safe medium of exchange for citizens to settle each other's debts. Otherwise, they say, private money could become as unreliable as wildcat banking before the Civil War, when currency issued by a Tennessee bank would trade at a 20 percent discount in Philadelphia.

Experimentalists, on the other hand, believe that the excitement around central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) is a fad – a bit like the “parachute pants” of the 1980s. Once a state has established a unit of account, it can step aside and allow the non-state sector to use its own stablecoin, an electronic representation pegged to the dollar, euro, yen or pound.

With no resolution in sight to this public-private battle, there is now a third factor – deposit tokens. The germ of this idea was recently validated as part of Project Guardian, a collaboration between the Bank of Singapore and the financial industry to explore the economic potential of asset tokenization. JPMorgan Chase & Co. turned Singapore dollar deposits into digital assets, setting them up to be transactable only with a few known wallet addresses and proving that institutional-level security can be achieved on a public blockchain.

Since 90% of all funds in circulation are bank deposits, the possibility that all this money supports "smart contracts" – self-executing software codes that initiate the exchange of monetary value when certain conditions are met – is a big deal.

Take a real estate transaction as an example. It is fairly common practice to use an escrow account during a conveyancing (i.e., the property changes hands). Less common, but not completely extinct, is the situation where the attorney running the escrow account runs away with the money. Now imagine that the purchase price is taken out of the deposit account and put into a digital piggy bank, and the seller has a key that can only be used when the apartment is sold. This is a smart contract. If the transaction fails, the piggy bank can be smashed.

Let CBDC and stablecoins — both retail products — compete for attention. The spoilers behind the scenes may well be, in fact, lackluster deposits. Savings go a long way. The risk that one party in a trade may not be able to pay what the other party owes is a nightmare that costs $2.2 trillion in cross-border payments every day. Blockchain has an atomic effect: both parties to a transaction either succeed together or fail together. Digital deposits may make settlement risk disappear. According to a report jointly released by Oliver Wyman and J.P. Morgan’s Onyx digital platform, consumers will gain efficiency gains as costs decrease:

In 2020, the capital cost of cross-border transfers of US$23.5 trillion was US$120 billion, and settlement took an average of 2-3 days. While we estimate that a multi-currency CBDC could reduce cross-border transfer costs by 80% to approximately $20 billion, deposit tokens could achieve similar benefits by reducing fees, settlement times, and counterparty risk, as well as allowing more direct fund transfers.

Most stablecoins maintain their fixed value with 1:1 financial backing. Every $1 of tokens minted by Tether or Thriker Internet Finance can (at least in theory) be redeemed by its issuer by paying off U.S. Treasuries or similar high-quality liquid assets. But not everyone thinks they are the future of money. "When everything goes well, most stablecoins trade close to face value. But it doesn't always go well," said Agustín Carstens, general manager of the Bank for International Settlements.

In contrast, CBDC carries a solemn promise from the country’s top money-printing institution to pay at face value.

Tokenized deposits fall somewhere in between. This is the power of the issuing bank, so it is not a true sovereign debt. However, most will still view it as sovereign debt. This is because the careful safeguards of deposit insurance and bank regulation not only give customers confidence that their funds are being deposited with the respective financial institutions, but will also continue to be effective. Unlike stablecoins, token deposits do not require 1:1 financial backing. This may be a good thing. It is more economically efficient to make the world’s limited safe assets freely available to more productive uses than to cram them into the cogs of gray blockchain transactions.

In the ideal world of traditional thinkers, tokenized deposits and CBDC might make stablecoins redundant. Carstens said it is conceivable that in the future commercial bank deposits and central bank funds "will be placed in the same configurable form on a comprehensive platform – a unified ledger".

For now, however, the experimentalists are winning. Silvergate Capital has shut down the Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN), clearing an important obstacle for institutional investors to exchange U.S. dollars for digital tokens. Blockchain analysis company Keco said: "With the death of SEN, stablecoins are likely to become more ubiquitous among traders. Instead of depositing dollars to exchanges, people deposit them to stablecoin issuers, receive stablecoins, and then transfer them to exchanges." (Compiled/Hu Wei)

Sign In

Forgot Password

Sign Up