Professional virtual currency information station welcome
We have been making efforts.

24-hour news update Page 22

24-hour cryptocurrency news update

A 90-year-old Veteran Of The War To Resist U.S. Aggression And Aid Korea Was Blinded By Eye Disease And Received Heart-warming Treatment At Changzheng Hospital And Regained His Sight.

A 90-year-old veteran who fought bloody battles to resist U.S. aggression and aid Korea, and was honored with military exploits, suffered from eye diseases in his later years and was nearly blind. Fortunately, under the careful treatment of the ophthalmology medical staff of the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changzheng Hospital), the veteran successfully regained his sight. Recently, the veteran came to the hospital again for a review to express his deep gratitude to the people's military doctors.

Gao Yu, an ophthalmologist at the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University, said: "Veterans of the Volunteer Army are the heroes of our country and have contributed so much to our happy life today. This treatment is not only an operation for us, but also a way to protect a heavy national memory."

With superb medical technology and meticulous teamwork, the operation was successfully completed. From admission assessment, intraoperative operation to postoperative care, the medical staff provided professional protection and warm companionship throughout the entire process, taking care of this combat hero like a relative. On the second day after the operation, when the medical staff slowly removed the gauze, the long-lost light once again came into the eyes of the veteran.

Gu Shuangxue, a veteran of the War to Resist U.S. Aggression and Aid Korea, said: "The hospitals in our country are very good, especially those of me who have served in the military. Returning to the military hospital to see a doctor is as friendly as returning to your parents' home. In addition, their service attitude is so good and so many people surround me. My eyes are much better than before, and I can still see when they are bright."

The veterans who have regained their sight often tell the medical staff about the turbulent years on the battlefield and the thrilling battle scenes, giving the young medical staff a vivid party and military history lesson that spans more than seventy years. When he was discharged from the hospital, the veteran wrote a handwritten letter of thanks to express his gratitude to the medical staff and his deep trust in the people's military doctors.

On April 1, The U.S. Supreme Court Reviewed The Legality Of Trump’s Directive Restricting Birthright Citizenship.

特朗普任命几位法官__特朗普提名了几个法官

U.S. Supreme Court (file photo)

On April 1, local time, the U.S. Supreme Court opened a hearing to review the legality of President Trump’s directive to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States. The controversial plan, which is tied to the Trump administration's efforts to curb immigration, would upend long-held understandings of a key provision of the U.S. Constitution if implemented.

Trump attended an oral argument at the Supreme Court on the policy of restricting birthright citizenship, becoming the first sitting president in U.S. history to attend a Supreme Court hearing in person. Demonstrators gathered outside the courthouse, some holding anti-Trump signs.

According to Clare Cushman, resident historian of the Supreme Court Historical Society, Trump is the first sitting president to appear at an oral argument before the Supreme Court. Although there are historical precedents for presidents to argue cases before the Supreme Court in the 19th century, they were no longer in office at the time, including John Quincy Adams, Grover Cleveland, and Benjamin Harrison.

The case stems from the Trump administration's appeal of a lower court ruling. Lower courts had previously blocked enforcement of the executive order. The order requires U.S. government agencies not to recognize U.S. citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents (green card holders).

The core of the dispute lies in the "birthright citizenship" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The provision has long been interpreted to mean birth in the United States provides citizenship, with only rare exceptions for children of diplomats. The Trump administration maintains that "subject to its jurisdiction" means that only those with "primary allegiance" to the United States can obtain citizenship for their children, thus excluding the children of illegal immigrants or temporary residents.

Analysis points out that if the Supreme Court ultimately upholds this position, it may affect the citizenship determination of as many as 250,000 newborns each year and have a knock-on impact on millions of families.

The case is expected to be decided before the end of June this year. The court currently has a 6-3 conservative majority, with three justices appointed by Trump during his first term. (CCTV reporter Zhu Lei)

Buffett Cuts Ties With Gates Over Epstein Case, Calling Him One Of The Most Successful Liars In History

According to a report on the US Fortune magazine website on March 31, American investor Warren Buffett said that he has severed contact with Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates since documents related to the case of the late sex offender Epstein were released. According to reports, this is the first time Buffett has made a public statement on the matter.

According to the report, the 95-year-old Buffett said in an interview with the US Consumer News and Business Channel (CNBC): "I have had no contact with him at all since the whole incident came to light. I don't want to be in the position of knowing something (because) I may be called to testify." Buffett also said that he did not want to comment too much on this topic until "the matter is resolved."

According to Buffett, he has never had any interaction with Epstein and has never met the man. He believes that because he has lived in Omaha, Nebraska for a long time, he did not have the opportunity to meet Epstein socially in New York. He said if you lived in New York and went to parties, you might have met him. Buffett called Epstein "one of the most successful liars in history." "I just couldn't believe how someone could deceive someone so successfully," he said.

"Fortune" magazine stated that the friendship between Buffett and Gates, the two former richest men in the world, began in 1991. The two later worked closely together in the philanthropic field, involving the Gates Foundation and launching the Giving Pledge initiative. Buffett has donated more than $43 billion to the Gates Foundation since 2006, accounting for nearly half of the foundation's total fundraising. In recent years, the relationship between the two has cooled. Buffett quit the Gates Foundation board of directors in 2021 and announced in 2024 that he would withdraw his decision to donate his inheritance to the foundation.

According to a previous report by the US "Wall Street Journal", Bill Gates apologized to Gates Foundation employees for his relationship with Epstein on February 24, admitting that he had extramarital affairs with two Russian women during his marriage, but at the same time insisted that he was not involved in Epstein's criminal behavior.

_巴菲特:因爱泼斯坦丑闻,我已与盖茨断绝联系_巴菲特:因爱泼斯坦丑闻,我已与盖茨断绝联系

Siba Media Reported Ju Jingyi’s Tax Evasion With Her Real Name. Who Can Handle The Escalation Of Conflicts Between The Two Parties?

Unexpectedly, the conflict between Siba Media and Ju Jingyi has not been resolved, and there has even been a subsequent controversy.

It just so happens that the new drama "Moonscale Qiji" starring Ju Jingyi is scheduled to be released on April 1, and the publicity is not small.

But the old club Siba Media couldn't stand it anymore and directly exposed the heavyweight Dagua.

Siba Media reported on March 30 that Ju Jingyi was suspected of tax evasion in 2024, claiming that her declared income was 11 million yuan, but her actual income exceeded 50 million yuan.

This mainly involves some film and television remuneration, business endorsements, etc. It is said that the rate of concealment is as high as 88%.

If it's just ordinary black material, it won't actually have much impact on traffic stars.

But tax evasion is so egregious that several celebrities have fallen into trouble, and some have even been banned from the industry.

Fan Moumou, Deng Moumou, and Yuan Moumou are all learning from the past!

Looking at it this way, Siba Media is planning to punish Ju Jingyi to death?

However, Ju Jingyi has always been very stubborn, otherwise she would not have made such a big show of breaking up with her old club.

After public opinion arose, her studio also issued a statement stating that the artist paid taxes in accordance with the law and had cooperated with the tax investigation, and would sue Siba for defamation and online rumors.

In fact, the two parties were involved in a lawsuit over a contract dispute before this, and it is still in the trial stage. As a result, something has happened here again. I am afraid it will be difficult to win or lose for a while.

But what is certain is that reconciliation between the two parties is impossible. On the contrary, there is a high probability that the situation will be a dead end. It depends on which party can't bear it first.

Of course, the lawsuit has to be decided by the court, and netizens cannot settle the case, so most people's attention is still on Ju Jingyi's salary.

It can be seen from the reporting materials of Siba Media that traffic florets like Ju Jingyi usually make a lot of money.

The remuneration for "Moonscale Chronicles" was as high as 16 million yuan, and Yaya's annual income from endorsements was 8 million yuan, and the share of magazine shooting was also around 11 million yuan to 9 million yuan.

Occasionally attend a party and perform a few small performances, and you can pocket 300,000 to 1.5 million yuan in remuneration in minutes.

Even if the company takes a portion of the money, it will still be a large sum of money in the celebrity's pocket.

Isn't it easy to get involved in the entertainment industry, but there are still many young people trying to get in. As long as the "208" are somewhat famous, they can make a lot of money.

Siba Media really knows how to manipulate public sentiment. Originally, netizens were targeting the company. After all, workers can sympathize with Ju Jingyi's experience.

Moreover, this company has always been known as "Domestic Entertainment in Northern Myanmar", and many young girls have suffered due to the termination of their contracts.

But after Siba Media released Ju Jingyi's salary, netizens naturally felt a distance from her. You must know that ordinary people may not earn as much as Ju Jingyi from filming a drama in their lifetime.

As a result, many people feel that instead of feeling sorry for Ju Jingyi, it is better to feel sorry for themselves.

But Siba Media will definitely not be left behind. It has also forced away the biggest "cash cow" of the entire company. Perhaps the end will be the same as that of Zhao Lusi's former company Galaxy Cool Entertainment.

Therefore, this kind of mutual conflict will only hurt both sides in the end.

However, if you think about it carefully, the most troublesome party now is actually not Ju Jingyi and Siba Media, but the drama team of "Moonscale Qiji".

Seeing that the drama has been successfully scheduled, I was still hoping to reap a wave of popularity after it went online, but now the direction of the traffic has obviously gone astray.

And this drama is not easy. It has been postponed three times. It was initially scheduled to be launched in January 2025 and has been postponed until April 2026.

Sharp-eyed netizens also discovered that in 2025, the official clearly marked Fan Shiqi as a "second unit friendly starring", but now his name has been deleted directly.

However, the other studio came forward and responded, "The scenes will be retained but the announcement will be adjusted." I guess many people have already guessed the secret.

Last year, Fan Shiqi was involved in a controversy involving other artists, and his popularity plummeted.

Presumably the showrunners were not allowed to change the direction of the promotion in order to avoid risks.

And now the starring Ju Jingyi is in controversy again, and it is still related to tax issues. If this is not resolved, the entire work will be affected.

So as long as "Moonscale Qiji" can be broadcast smoothly, it is actually a victory.

Not only that, Ju Jingyi has not only this drama, but also several works such as "Come to Fight", "A Thousand Fragrances", and "World of Flowers".

If tax evasion is true, then these works will also have to face the problem of replacing people for reshoots or AI changing faces, which is another huge investment.

From this point of view, the truth of this crisis has determined the efforts of many works, creators and actors. I hope that a result can be given as soon as possible.

At the same time, we also hope that the conflict between Ju Jingyi and Siba Media can be resolved through legal channels and they will not continue to occupy public resources.

So do you believe Siba Media’s accusations against Ju Jingyi, and do you think Ju Jingyi can solve this incident?

U.S. Secretary Of State Rubio Requires Embassies And Consulates Abroad To Use The X Platform To Strengthen The Direction Of U.S. Foreign Public Opinion

According to the British "Guardian" news on March 30, U.S. Secretary of State Rubio has officially issued instructions to U.S. embassies and consulates around the world, requiring them to unite in carrying out external publicity work and make every effort to tell the "American story."

Rubio made it clear in the directive that the X platform is an "innovative" tool to assist the United States in its foreign propaganda, and requires foreign affairs personnel stationed abroad to make full use of the platform to specifically remove "anti-American information" on the platform and strengthen the direction of U.S. foreign public opinion. This directive also makes clear requirements for the cooperation partners of embassies and consulates, stipulating that they must cooperate with the US military's psychological warfare force, the Military Information Support Operations (MISO), to jointly deal with the so-called "disinformation problem."

It is reported that the core function of the Military Information Support Operations (MISO) is to influence the cognition, emotions and behavior of foreign audiences through targeted information transmission to serve the relevant goals of the US government and military. This linkage with embassies and consulates abroad means that the United States will further combine military information operations with diplomatic propaganda and strengthen the control of global public opinion.

The issuance of this directive comes against the backdrop of the military conflict between the United States, Israel and Iraq that has lasted for more than a month. Currently, the confrontation between the United States and Iran in the field of public opinion is equally fierce: the United States accuses Iran of operating the most complex and active "national disinformation machine" in the world, while Iran counterattacks, accusing the United States of being a "professional liar" and carrying out misleading propaganda by repeating "big lies." The public opinion confrontation between the two sides has further escalated.

In addition, Rubio's directive also contains a number of specific requirements, including recruiting local Internet celebrities, scholars, and community leaders to participate in propaganda to give the illusion of "localization" of U.S.-funded content; highlighting the American flag logo in foreign aid to strengthen the spread of "American goodwill"; positioning more than 700 American cultural centers around the world as "free speech zones," which in fact creates a one-way pro-U.S. public opinion circle. It is worth noting that the EU has just fined X platform 120 million euros for "deceptive behavior". At this time, the United States uses this platform as a core tool in public opinion warfare, and its double standards have attracted attention from the outside world.

Many Countries Ban Minors From Using Social Software, Don’t Let Algorithms Ruin The Next Generation

_“社媒禁令”看似坚决未必有效_“社媒禁令”看似坚决未必有效

Wu Chen/Wen After Australia took the lead in legislating to ban minors under the age of 16 from using mainstream social media, two more countries followed suit: France passed a bill on March 31 to restrict the use of social network platforms by minors under the age of 15; Indonesia officially implemented a social media ban for people under the age of 16 on March 28. The French parliament defines social media as an "assembly line for mass production of anxiety", pointing out its erosion of young people's bodies and minds; Indonesia has tightened access to digital space with the goal of preventing addiction and online harm.

A global digital protection campaign for minors has begun. Behind the unanimous adoption of tough controls by many countries is a sober consensus on the same issue: social media has caused systemic harm to minors, with problems such as addiction, addiction, distraction, disconnection from reality, filter beautification, and online bullying. The negative impact on the growth of young people cannot be ignored.

The harm caused by social media to minors has evolved from a case-by-case risk to a common hazard. A large number of studies and real-life observations have confirmed that the platform algorithm accurately takes advantage of the physiological characteristics of the adolescent brain's "strong reward system and weak self-control system" to create high-intensity addiction with infinite refresh and instant feedback, resulting in continuous fragmentation of attention and rapid decline in in-depth reading and focused thinking abilities. The filter culture of the virtual world "beautifies" life and distorts aesthetics, causing teenagers to fall into self-doubt in comparison, leading to a significant increase in psychological problems such as depression and anxiety. What's even more serious is that the screen isolates real interactions, and many children show symptoms of "social bulliness" online and "social fear" offline, and their real-life social skills are weakened; online bullying is highly concealed, spreads quickly, and is deeply harmful, and also leaves long-term psychological trauma for minors.

However, setting a ban across the board based on age is essentially a relatively rigid and extensive control method. It may seem resolute, but it may not be truly effective, let alone respond to the real growth needs of digital natives.

On the one hand, there are obvious technical loopholes in age verification. Minors can easily bypass restrictions by simply borrowing their family members' identity information and modifying their account information. The stricter the supervision, the more likely they will be driven to switch to niche platforms with weaker supervision, making the risks even more uncontrollable. On the other hand, the ban ignores the reality of the digital age: children of this generation are born digital natives. For some marginalized and isolated teenagers, social media is an important channel to find identity and gain support. A simple ban may cut off their social connections and intensify loneliness and alienation. More importantly, the ban cannot answer the question of "how to use it". It treats the symptoms but not the root cause, and cannot fundamentally improve the digital literacy and self-protection abilities of young people.

Applying the wisdom of ancient water management, the real challenge is never to ban the use, but to find a balance between blocking and dredging. How to make good use of high-tech tools, especially the ever-changing AI tools, to rebuild warm face-to-face connections is a proposition that countries around the world must face head-on.

When Australia took the lead in banning social media, the whole world was waiting to see the effect of this "social experiment". Follow-up by France and Indonesia will increase the number of samples in the experiment, and its effects are worthy of our careful review in the future. More importantly, the whole society needs to invest more energy in cultivating digital literacy. The core is to teach young people to use high-tech tools rationally and not be dominated by tools. This means that media literacy, digital ethics, and information identification skills must be incorporated into normal education, so that young people can understand the logic of algorithms, identify false information, reasonably manage usage time, learn to protect personal privacy, and shift from passive addiction to active control.

More important than digital literacy is the reestablishment of warm face-to-face connections between people. The biggest hidden danger of social media is replacing real companionship with virtual likes and diluting in-depth communication with fragmented interactions. When teenagers’ social satisfaction is highly dependent on online feedback, their real-life empathy, expression, and stress-resistance abilities will gradually deteriorate. Therefore, the core of Shu is to bring children away from the screen and back into life: firstly, to return to the family, and keep family dinner table communication and living room interaction away from mobile phones; secondly, to encourage more real-world participation and experience, encourage sports, art, and outdoor exploration, so that teenagers can learn to observe body language and try interactive communication in real-world interactions, so as to learn to understand others, express themselves, and build trust.

In addition, we also need to learn to listen. Some minors may see adults' "patriarchal" declarations in the one-size-fits-all ban, but we do not want the "social media ban" to trigger a cat-and-mouse game and strengthen the rebellious psychology of minors. We also need to encourage innovation, especially the development of "responsible" AI, which may subvert the "attention economy" that social media relies on. It no longer gives you what you want (increasing addiction), but gives you what you need (guidance and recommendations). After all, digital communication has become an indispensable method for the entire society.

(The author is a financial writer, former editor-in-chief of "The Economist·Business Review", and founder of Chen Bookstore)

Liwang Co., Ltd. Was Fined 231,900 Yuan For Illegal Construction In 2004, And The Actual Controller Was Fully Compensated.

On March 30, battery dealer Liwang Co., Ltd. (BJ920627) announced that the company received an administrative penalty decision issued by the Dongguan Municipal Urban Management and Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau on March 26. In 2004, Shiliwang Co., Ltd. built houses without obtaining the "Construction Project Planning Permit" and was now fined 231,900 yuan.

According to the commitment letters previously issued by the actual controllers of the company, Li Weihai and Wang Hongqi, they fully compensated the above fines to the company's account through bank transfer on March 28, with each person bearing 50%.

Liwang Co., Ltd. stated that this administrative penalty is a penalty accepted by the company in accordance with the "Dongguan City Implementation Plan for Renewal of Real Estate Rights for Illegal Buildings with Historical Legacy Industries and Public Supporting Types" and in the process of resubmitting the formalities for illegal buildings with historical legacy and will have no significant impact on the company's daily operations.

Paying for illegal construction at the beginning of this century

The penalty decision shows that the company built three reinforced concrete buildings (2 industrial plants and 1 employee dormitory) at No. 10 Liantangjiao 2nd Road, Tangxia Town, Dongguan City without obtaining a planning permit, with a total building base area of ​​2,194.02 square meters and a total construction area of ​​7,731.45 square meters. The construction of the above-mentioned building started in 2004 and was completed and put into use between 2004 and 2005.

According to regulations, the relevant departments ordered the company to complete the procedures within a time limit and imposed a fine of 5% of the construction project cost, which is a fine of 231,900 yuan.

The announcement shows that the company’s actual controllers Li Weihai and Wang Hongqi issued a letter of commitment on June 16, 2023, promising that if the listed company is subject to administrative penalties by the competent authorities due to the lack of legal ownership certificates and/or complete construction application procedures for houses and buildings, it will compensate the listed company for all losses incurred thereby.

On March 28, Li Weihai and Wang Hongqi fully compensated the above-mentioned fines to the company account through bank transfer, and Liwang Co., Ltd. paid the fine in full to the Dongguan Municipal Urban Management and Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau on March 30.

He has been punished several times for past illegal construction activities.

Liwang Shares has been subject to administrative penalties many times since 2023 due to problems left over from its land and real estate history.

In November 2023, the listed company received two administrative penalty decisions.

First, on November 2, 2023, Liwang Co., Ltd. received the "Administrative Penalty Decision of Dongguan Urban Management and Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau". Because the listed company did not obtain the "Construction Project Planning Permit" and built three buildings (two factories and one dormitory) between 2011 and 2012, it was fined 8.5% of the construction project cost, amounting to 1.8501 million yuan. The company paid in full on November 3, 2023. Li Weihai and Wang Hongqi compensated for the above-mentioned fine losses on May 20, 2024.

On November 29, 2023, Liwang Co., Ltd. received the "Administrative Penalty Decision of Dongguan Municipal Natural Resources Bureau". Since 2011, the company has been constructing a factory on the land at No. 10, Liantangjiao 2nd Road, Tangxia Town, Dongguan City without legal approval, and it was completed and put into use in 2012. The actual land area occupied by the above behavior was 4809.3 square meters (7.21 acres), and Liwang Co., Ltd. was fined approximately 91,200 yuan. The company will pay in full on November 29, 2023. Li Weihai and Wang Hongqi also compensated for the above-mentioned fine losses on May 20, 2024.

In December 2024, the company faced tax penalties again. On December 12 this year, Liwang Shares received a "Tax Matters Notice" issued by the Tangxia Taxation Branch of the Dongguan Municipal Taxation Bureau of the State Administration of Taxation. Since 2011, a listed company has occupied garden land for construction without legal approval and needs to pay back farmland occupation tax of approximately 215,400 yuan and incurred late payment fees, totaling 430,700 yuan. The company has paid all farmland occupation taxes and late payment fees in full on December 16, 2024. Soon after, Li Weihai and Wang Hongqi compensated the late payment penalty for the above-mentioned fine (approximately 215,400 yuan).

To sum up, Liwang Co., Ltd. has paid more than 2.6 million yuan in various fines due to previous illegal construction activities.

Liwang Co., Ltd. emphasized in most relevant announcements about the above-mentioned penalties that the relevant penalties are penalties accepted by the company in accordance with the "Dongguan City Implementation Plan for Renewal of Real Estate Rights for Illegal Buildings with Historical Legacy Industries and Public Supporting Types" in the process of re-registering the formalities for illegal buildings with historical legacy and will have no significant impact on the company's daily operations.

daily economic news

The 48 Teams Selected For The World Cup Between The United States, Canada And Mexico Caused Political Turmoil When Italy Failed To Qualify For The Third Consecutive Time

[Global Network Report] According to the US "Politics" news network and the British Reuters report on April 1, on April 1, all 48 participating teams for the US-Canada-Mexico World Cup were selected. Italy, once regarded as a football powerhouse, once again failed to advance, even causing turmoil in Italian politics. According to Reuters, Italy's failure to qualify for the World Cup for the third consecutive time in 12 years has plunged this football-loving country into a sports nightmare. The whole country of Italy is angry and disappointed.

_“一个热衷足球国家陷入体育噩梦”,外媒:意大利连续3次无缘世界杯,引政治风波_“一个热衷足球国家陷入体育噩梦”,外媒:意大利连续3次无缘世界杯,引政治风波

According to reports, in the European qualifying play-off final held on March 31, local time, Italy lost to Bosnia and Herzegovina in a penalty shootout and failed to advance. This was the third consecutive time that the country failed to qualify for the World Cup since 2014. Italy won the World Cup for the fourth time in 2006, but since then, Italy has only won one game in the World Cup. The main Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera used the term "the curse of the World Cup" to describe the predicament of Italian football.

The "Political" news network stated that the defeat of the Italian men's football team triggered anger across Italy, and various political parties called on the Italian Football Association Chairman Gravina to resign. Italian Sports Minister Abedi said, "Italian football clearly needs to be revitalized, and this must start with a change in the leadership of the Italian Football Association."

Bignami, the leader of the House of Representatives caucus of the Italian ruling party Brotherhood, wrote on social media

Italy's opposition parties, on the other hand, are holding the ruling party accountable. Grimaldi, a member of the Italian Green Party and the Left Alliance, called on the ruling party, "You can ask Gravina to step down, but do not evade your due responsibilities." Italian Democratic Party congressman Berruto agreed and said the government should focus on investigating "the reasons that have led to the abyss of Italian football."

"Politique" news network said that Italy's ruling party has proposed to hold a briefing in Parliament to discuss football issues.

Trump Has Reversed His Attitude Towards Iran. One Moment He Talks About Bombing Iran Back To The Stone Age, And The Next He May Withdraw Its Troops.

Trump's latest post on Wednesday night, Beijing time, claimed that "the president of Iran's new regime is much more rational and less extreme than his predecessors. He has just requested a ceasefire from the United States! And we will not consider it until the Strait of Hormuz is reopened and unobstructed. Before that, we will bomb Iran into rubble, or as they say, bomb it back to the Stone Age."

This is the latest twist in Trump's recent signals. However, almost at the same time as Trump posted, Reuters published an interview with him. He told the agency that the United States will "withdraw from Iran soon" and may return to Iran for "sporadic strikes" if necessary. Trump is often inconsistent, but it is unusual for him to express almost diametrically opposed attitudes at the same time.

Prior to this, a large number of signs collected by public opinion pointed to Trump's desire to declare "victory in the war" and run away. Some people even predict that Trump will "declare victory" when he delivers a national address at 9 a.m. Beijing time on Thursday. Affected by this optimism, Asian stock markets soared on Wednesday, and European stock markets continued to surge after the opening, continuing the momentum of U.S. stock markets' surge on Tuesday. U.S. stocks continued to rise after opening on Wednesday.

伊朗出手了视频_怎么看别人补刀补到了_

In his post, Trump did not explain who the so-called "President of the new Iranian regime" is. The current president of Iran is still Pezhichiyan, who was elected in July 2024. Pezeshchiyan said in a statement on Tuesday that Iran has the "necessary will" to end the war, provided that the other side meets Iran's demands, especially the necessary guarantees that it will no longer invade. There is no difference between his statement and his previous statement.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Bagaei said that Trump’s so-called statement on social media that “the president of Iran’s new regime requested a ceasefire” is purely false news.

After Trump posted, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps quickly responded on social media, saying, "The situation in the Strait of Hormuz is completely under the control of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy and will not reopen the door to Iran's enemies just because of the US president's show."

Just on Wednesday, the Iranian parliament issued a statement that the Strait of Hormuz will not be opened, we have not held any negotiations, and we will not hold any negotiations in the future. Ali Nikzadeh, deputy speaker of Iran's parliament, said on Wednesday that "the supreme leader has not approved any negotiations at this time."

怎么看别人补刀补到了__伊朗出手了视频

Iranian President Pezhiziyan

Many analysts believe that because many Iranian leaders were killed in bombings and most current senior officials do not use mobile phones and basically do not hold meetings, it is difficult to form a unified authoritative attitude. What is certain is that the United States and Iran have not had direct communication so far.

A senior Iranian official told CNN that Trump's latest posts did not reliably reflect what was going on. "This trait reflects an unstable and eccentric personality."

Trump's contradictory remarks on Wednesday lowered expectations for his speech on Thursday morning. Maybe whatever Trump says or decides he announces on Thursday morning is not that important. Because he has made too many "heavyweight" statements before, but his words are contradictory, and he may overturn any important decision on his own.

The most important thing is that this war fell into a stalemate rare in the history of human war. As President of the United States, Trump is in a serious dilemma and does not know what to do. In fact, after he muddle-headedly fought the war for nearly five weeks, the entire U.S. strategic community was also trapped. It can be said that even the top figures in the U.S. strategic community have no idea what to do now.

A few days ago, public opinion focused on criticizing Trump for wanting to escalate the war and open up a ground battlefield. But in the past two days, after Trump clearly expressed his intention to withdraw, another voice came out again. Suzanne Maloney, an Iran expert at the Brookings Institution in Washington, said it would be "extremely irresponsible" to end military operations before the Strait of Hormuz opens. Maloney said that the United States and Israel jointly launched this war and cannot escape the consequences of the war. "Energy markets are global in nature, and the United States is not immune to the economic damage that has been caused, which will worsen exponentially if the strait remains closed."

_怎么看别人补刀补到了_伊朗出手了视频

CNN stated that if the war ends with Iran controlling the Strait of Hormuz, the international community will regard the United States as a strategic failure. Iran is sure to claim victory and may believe it has rebuilt its deterrent against future attacks. Iran is likely to try to profit from its new controlling position by imposing tolls on transit tankers. This would provide funds to rebuild military, missile and even nuclear programs destroyed in US-Israeli air strikes.

But what can we do if we don’t retreat? If the war continues, it will become a ground war. As CNN said, any attempt to reopen the Strait by force will cause heavy casualties to the US military and prolong the war, further weakening Trump's already precarious political authority at home.

CNN analyzed that withdrawal may cause turmoil, but it is in line with Trump's way of doing things. Withdrawing would also perpetuate the "America First" principle, which states that the United States should always act within its exclusive national interests. In addition, withdrawing would vent Trump's anger at NATO allies, who he believes are parasitic on U.S. security guarantees.

But CNN writes that the United States does not exist in a vacuum defined by Trump's remarks. If a rejuvenated Iran is allowed to retain control of the Strait of Hormuz, it will be hard-pressed to escape the economic and political fallout. Trump may be able to concoct a political rhetoric to explain his exit, but markets may not be easily persuaded.

In the past two days, Trump has continuously criticized NATO. "The Daily Telegraph" published an interview with Trump on Wednesday. When asked whether he would reconsider the United States remaining in NATO after the war, Trump said: "Oh, yes, I would say (this) there is no room for reconsideration… I have never been swayed by NATO. I have always known that they are paper tigers, and by the way, Putin also knows that."

NATO allies refused to support Trump's Iran war, opposed the US military's use of bases in Europe to bomb Iran, and even closed their airspace to US military combat aircraft, which made Trump very angry. Even Secretary of State Rubio, one of the most pro-NATO members of Trump’s team, has fired shots at NATO. "NATO is a one-way street," Rubio said, complaining that Europe was eager for the United States to defend it but was failing to provide the help the United States sought. "After this conflict is over, we're going to have to reexamine this relationship," Rubio said.

On Tuesday, Trump again blasted European allies, accusing them of refusing to become more involved in Iran's war. He accused France of refusing to allow U.S. warplanes to fly through its airspace and sneered that Britain should show some "belated courage" to get "its own oil" from the Gulf.

British Prime Minister Starmer said on Wednesday that Britain would turn to the European Union after being taunted by Trump. He also defended NATO as "the most effective military alliance the world has ever seen." Starmer also said on Wednesday: "No matter how much pressure I and others face, no matter how much noise is made from the outside world, I will safeguard Britain's national interests in all the decisions I make, which is why I have been very clear that this is not our war and we will not be involved in it."

During a visit to Japan on Wednesday, Macron praised Europe's "predictability" and contrasted it with countries that "could harm you without even informing you." French media said that this was obviously a subtle mockery of Trump.

伊朗出手了视频__怎么看别人补刀补到了

On April 1, Macron and Sanae Takaichi held a joint press conference in Tokyo. (Source: Associated Press)

The conflict between Trump and NATO is a renewed outbreak of the conflicts between the two sides that have accumulated since last year's trade war. It also reflects Trump's anxiety about being unable to extricate himself from the quagmire of Iran. If the United States really wants to withdraw from NATO, it is not a trivial matter, and it cannot be done by Trump's willful decision. It will encounter a huge backlash in US domestic strategic circles.

But the signs that Trump wants to run away are the first to stimulate America's Gulf allies such as the United Arab Emirates. Gulf countries have become increasingly clear in their opposition to negotiations between the United States and Iran, advocating for a military solution to the problem to ensure that Iran can no longer control the straits and can no longer carry out strikes against the Gulf countries in retaliation for the United States. According to the Wall Street Journal, since the outbreak of the war, the UAE has been attacked by about 2,500 Iranian missiles and drones, making it the most attacked among the Gulf countries. The UAE said it was ready to join the war and help the United States fight Iran.

The summary is that Trump has begun to intend to withdraw, and it seems that he has decided to withdraw. The whole world saw this, and found that he had no good retreat at all and could only use sophistry to promote this war as a comprehensive victory for the United States. He's really hard.

People see at least two major contradictions in Trump's statements: First, Trump once said that the war would be ended soon, and whether to open the strait was secondary. On another occasion, he said that Iran must open the strait first, otherwise he would bomb Iran back to the Stone Age. The second contradiction is that he said that the United States has "bombed Iran to pieces" and the most important thing has been done. It is the allies' own business to open the strait. On another occasion, he said that Iran's opening of the strait is a prerequisite for the US ceasefire, and he took the job back.

In short, Trump wants to run away now, but he probably can’t. As for what he will do next, the reality is that he cannot control the situation, and the situation cannot control him. Chaos will be inevitable.

The Conflict In The Middle East Has Hindered The Production Capacity Of The Aluminum Industry, And The Automobile Industry Has Been Affected By The Shortage Of Aluminum Materials And The Cost Has Risen.

“Conflict in the Middle East is derailing the auto industry.”

An analysis recently published by "Forbes" magazine said that this conflict is a "disaster" for the automobile industry.

Among them, aluminum is the latest victim of the conflict.

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps issued a statement on March 29 stating that the Revolutionary Guards used missiles and drones to attack two aluminum factories in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain related to the U.S. military and aerospace industry.

Subsequently, the production capacity of the three major aluminum giants in the Gulf region, Emirates Global Aluminum, Bahrain Aluminum, and Qatar Aluminum, was blocked. Among them, Bahrain Aluminum operates the world's largest single aluminum smelter, with an annual production capacity of 1.6 million tons.

ANZ data shows that the Middle East accounts for 9% of global aluminum production, and due to supply constraints in specific regions, the region can meet 18% of global demand. Currently, 4 million to 5 million tons of exports are at risk.

According to data from the German automotive professional publication AMS, 70% of the processed aluminum of Japanese automakers comes from the Middle East, and 20% of the aluminum imports of U.S. manufacturers come from the region. South Korea and other automotive industries also rely on the Middle East for aluminum.

Aluminum is the most critical but most underestimated link in the automotive industry chain.

According to AMS analysis, an ordinary family car uses more than 200 kilograms of aluminum. Body, suspension, power system, everything is inseparable.

_中东战火_中东战火再起对中国有影响吗

New energy vehicles are even worse. Lin Boqiang, director of the China Energy Policy Research Institute at Xiamen University, told Sanlihe that aluminum is the skeleton material of new energy vehicles. A shortage of aluminum may lead to a shortage of raw materials, and high aluminum prices will push up vehicle manufacturing costs. Both factors may affect production.

According to Bloomberg, on March 30, aluminum prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME) jumped 5.5% to hit $3,492 per ton, setting a new high since April 2022. Since the outbreak of the conflict, the cumulative increase in aluminum prices has reached 10%, and the "war premium" continues to spread.

Ross Strokan, head of raw materials at analyst firm CRU Group, warned that supply disruptions could cause aluminum prices to soar to the $4,000 per ton mark given current inventory levels.

For car companies, this means that the cost of every body panel and every suspension arm will go up.

According to the latest data from market agency MarketsandMarkets, affected by the conflict, the global light vehicle growth rate is expected to slow down from the previously predicted 3.8% to 0-2%.

So, can we not use aluminum?

"At present, it is difficult." Lin Boqiang admitted that relevant research is indeed ongoing, and magnesium-aluminum synergy and other methods may appear in the near future, but the starting point is to find cheaper and more practical materials.

The energy crisis is still raging at this moment.

Cars are undoubtedly large energy users. According to AMS's calculations, companies with oil prices lower than US$70 will barely have profit margins, but they are no longer profitable in today's oil price environment of US$110.

This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Analysts say cars typically contain 150 to 200 kilograms of plastic and polymer parts. About 40% of the supply of naphtha, the basic raw material for these chemicals, comes from the Gulf region.

A more hidden danger is helium.

Qatar produces about a third of the world's helium, which is essential in semiconductor manufacturing.

At present, the supply of helium is facing interruption. At a time when the demand for automotive chips is soaring due to electronics and intelligence, the rise in semiconductor manufacturing costs is almost a foregone conclusion.

Without chips, cars cannot be built, which will directly affect car production plans.

The most direct impact occurred on the Middle East automobile market.

Toyota has announced that it will cut production of nearly 40,000 vehicles for the Middle East market. Nissan is also adjusting its production plans.

Volkswagen Group CEO Oliver Blume said the conflict could lead to weaker demand for high-end cars in the region, with particular concerns about the Porsche and Audi brands.

Why? Because the Middle East is the profit cow for high-end cars.

According to analysis by Metzler Research Analyst Pal Skirta, annual vehicle sales in the Middle East are approximately 3 million vehicles. Sales in the United Arab Emirates alone exceed 300,000 vehicles a year, of which about 20% are high-end imports.

Now, the war is burning directly at the tail of this "cash cow".

Those who ultimately bear the risk premium may be workers who lose their jobs due to production line shutdowns, and more likely, every consumer who drives on the road.

"Sanlihe" Studio

Sign In

Forgot Password

Sign Up